Archive for the ‘writing’ Category

My schizophrenic 15 minutes

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

Week two into my new job…

Turns out the company I’m working for bills its clients in 15 min increments which means I’m tracking 8 hrs of my life/5 days a week in quarter-hour slices.

I’ve taken a cue from others in cubicle-land and now keep post-it notes on the side of my computer where I write down what I’m working on during the day. End of day comes and hopefully I’m hitting the billable requirements.

Major change from the uber-unstructured student life I’ve been living, especially the  past six months of thesis-writing. On the upside, the powers-that-be at work are interested in having me give a presentation on my thesis. This will fulfill several 15 mins.

Andy Warhol

It’s not-U, it’s me

Monday, April 16th, 2007

Prince William is single after a rumored intervention by the royal family due to Kate’s ‘common-ness.’

A little research into this curious phenomenon of British class snobbery led to Nancy Mitford’s theory on “U” and “non-U”; that is, upper-class and non-upper-class language. According to a Wikipedia citation (very non-u), Mitford provided a glossary of terms used by the upper-classes which unleashed an anxious national debate about English class-consciousness.

I’ve mentioned before, I heart lists:

U Non-U
Bike or Bicycle Cycle
Dinner Jacket Dress Suit
Knave Jack (cards)
Vegetables Greens
Ice Ice Cream
Scent Perfume
They’ve a very nice house. They have a lovely home.
Ill (in bed) Sick (in bed)
I was sick on the boat. I was ill on the boat.
Looking-Glass Mirror
Spectacles Glasses
False Teeth Dentures
Die Pass on
Mad Mental
Jam Preserve
Napkin Serviette
Sofa Settee
Lavatory or Loo Toilet
Rich Wealthy
What? Pardon?

It’s predicted many a girl are dusting off their ballgowns now that Will is back on the market, but personally I’ve been over him for ages now. It’s Hot Harry who’s more attention worthy.

Definition of the day: Shibboleth - any language usage indicative of one’s social or regional origin, or more broadly, any practice that identifies members of a group.

Proper usage: “That’s such a shibboleth use of language.” *Deliver comment in an off-hand manner and with a deadpan expression = Guaranteed conversation killer*

Late night reading

Friday, April 13th, 2007

 

It’s 2am… the reality of my deadlines is finally hitting me (two weeks late). In my deluded state I’m considering the possibility my thesis topic is divinely inspired.

From Marita Sturken’s Technological Visions:

Spinning technology through the Fall of Man narrative casts us as the ignorant architects of our own undoing. In this narrative, we make our artifacts but they in turn cast us out into world in which we are not suited. The narrative of the Fall reduces the dynamic relations of people and technology to a story in which technology is the cruel, decisive actor. It was a God with ultimate power who expelled humans from the Garden of Eden. The new narratives of the Fall put technology into that position. They rationalize human passivity in the face of anxiety about technology. They give a sense of inevitability to people’s feelings of impotence in the face of our creations” (Struken et al. 2004: 23-24).

“Spin is distracting. Overheated debates about computer addiction and Internet depression keep us from confronting issues raised by contemporary technology that are resistant to the oversimplification of spin…Technology does things for use but also to us, to our ways of perceiving the world, to our relationships and sense of ourselves” (Struken et al. 2004: 23).

“The world-view of most of the industrialized world remains relentlessly modern in its valuing of science, technology, growth, and progress. Yet these modern sensibilities are integrated with an increasingly postmodern sensibility – a sense of cynicism and fatigue with modernity’s hurtling forward into the future, a world increasingly defined by the digital, the computer, and the virtual… Yet this feeling of life speeding out of control is a deeply modern one, one that prevailed throughout the twentieth century. This moment in history is thus defined specifically by the tensions of living with both the heightened qualities of modernity and the shifting worldview of postmodernism” (Struken et al. 2004: 72).

Too late to comment on these strings of writing, but I think I’ve found a conclusion.

— Speaking of ’spin’… Kurt Vonnegut passed away yesterday at 84, amazed at his old age after a life-long smoking habit. After joining the army and working for the Chicago City News Bureau, he did PR for General Electric, “a job he loathed.” He published four books before be able to give up selling Saabs to support himself.

I suppose it’s stories like Dana Vachon’s that keep the hope alive for all those bloggers out there. A 28 yr. old prep-kid-turned-investment-banker-turned-blogger got a $650,000 advance to write about his insights into NYC society. The book has already been optioned to the company who produced Babel. It’s possible he provides an illuminating perspective, but not likely of the slaughterhouse 5 variety. See above for ’shifting worldview of postmodernism.’

 

 

 

 

weekend fun

Monday, April 9th, 2007

Chpts 1-4 in at the end of the month = reading fun.

This list would have been so useful at the beginning of last year. I heart lists.

Modern Postmodern

  • National/international…………………………………………………..global
  • Hierarchical social structure………………………………………….network society
  • Mechanical…………………………………………………………………….electronic
  • Industrial………………………………………………………………………postindustrial
  • Urban city…………………………………………….suburban sprawl, megalopolis
  • Geographical space replaced by social space………………….nonplace
  • Cartesian space……………………………………………………………..virtual space
  • Standing in a crowd……………………………………………………….social isolation
  • Surrounded by strangers………………………………………………mobile privatization
  • Circulation of traffic in city…………………………………………….internet ‘traffic’
  • City strolling, the flaneur……………………………………………….web surfing
  • Time as measurable………………………………………………………time as global
  • Time as linear…………………………………………………………………time shifting
  • Analog clock/watch………………………………………………….digital clock/watch
  • Railroad………………………………………………………………….rapid speed trains
  • Telegraph………………………………………………………………………internet
  • Subway…………………………………………………………………………..freeway
  • Airplane………………………………………………………………………….space shuttle
  • Automobile as transportation…………………………………..automobile as style
  • Radio………………………………………………………………………………walkman
  • Photograph……………………………………………………………………..digital image
  • Typewriter……………………………………………………………………..computer
  • Typewriter keyboard………………………………………………..computer mouse
  • Television…………………………………………………………………..multimedia/DVD/TiVo
  • Cinema……………………………………………………………………………virtual reality
  • Telephone……………………………………………………………………….cell phone
  • Space travel………………………………….travel inside body through fiberoptics
  • The body as circulatory system……………………….the body as a genetic map
  • Tuberculosis and antibiotics……………………………………..AIDS and retroviruses
  • Representations………………………………………………………………simulacrum
  • Autonomous subject……………multiple and fragmented subjectivities
  • Wars of guns, bombs, machines…………………………………………virtual/cyberwar
  • Wars as conflicts between nations……………………………………terrorism

Sontag’s journals

Sunday, September 10th, 2006

“The ideal life: doing only things which are indispensable.”

Six pages of Susan Sontag’s journals were published in the NYTimes Magazine this weekend. Even an NYC intellectual had a soft spot for CA:

“In Calif., a stranger is a [potential] friend until he proves otherwise; in NY, a stranger is an enemy until he proves otherwise.”
Admittedly contemptuous:
“The only people who should interest themselves in an art (or several arts) are those who practice it — or have — or aspire to. The whole idea of an “audience” is wrong. The artist’s audience is his peers.”

What does this mean… about writing, blogging, peers, audiences, the blogosphere?

When asked how she felt about discovering 3/4s of the way through something that the writing was mediocre and inferior, she responds with, “I feel good and plow on to the end. I’m discharging the mediocre in myself. (My excremental image of my writing.) It’s there. I want to get rid of it. I can’t negate it by an act of will. (Or can I?) I can only allow it its voice, get it “out.” Then I can do something else.”

I must keep this in mind when writing the thesis. Moving on, so I can do something else.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/10/magazine/10sontag.html?pagewanted=1

Author

A little something about you, the author. Nothing lengthy, just an overview.

You are currently browsing the archives for the writing category.